Atoms and Materialism



Monkey's Uncle
Fun With Atheism Issue, Fall/Winter 1985
Editor: E.T. Babinski



WHAT IS EVERYTHING? If everything is matter, then what is "matter?"


Physicists no longer define "matter" as indivisible bits of particular size, weight and position. They don't even say that matter is "made of" bodies called atoms, protons, electrons, and so on. The word atom or electron is now used as part of an overall descriptive observation that has no meaning except as used by people who know the experiments by which it is revealed. "In field theory, instead of having matter sitting out in space like lumps, you concentrate on the way things interact. The relationships of matter and energy and time are what's determinant. Nothing is static, everything is dependent on and defined by the movements of everything else. The field is not so much a place where all this happens, but a conjunction, the interaction itself. As if the universe is recreating itself, moment by moment" (from Disturbances in the Field, a novel by Lynne Sharon Schwartz).


    Modern physics also teaches
  1. That a certain particle is able to pass, in its undivided state, through two different holes at the same time.
  2. There are large 'holes in the sky' into which time and space not only disappear but in which they actually cease to be.
  3. And that the term 'quark' describes a particle of which the essential property when three of them combine, their collective weight is less than that of any one of them by itself; although nothing has been lost by their conjunction.
  4. Of course the apparent 'solidity' of 'matter' does not exist on the atomic scale, wherein all things are in constant and rapid motion.
  5. Lastly, note the book review.

Thus, modern physics focuses more on the configuration of the cosmos, rather than on proving its solidity or materiality!


But doesn't this mean that the philosophy known as "materialism" is a bit more difficult to believe in today, than during the machine-minded 19th century? Back then, the cosmos was pictured as a giant watch. But today it is picture as a vast flowing 'field' of space/time/matter/energy.


So today, the heart of 'matter' is thought to resemble 'brain waves' more closely than 'billiard balls!'


Secondly, there has always existed the philosophical objection to materialism that, since we only know "matter" through our senses, and our senses only detect the outer sensations of things, then how do we know what the essence of "matter" really is? "Belief in 'matter' is thus a faith in the unseeable--in the famous 'pincushion hidden by innumerable pins' which Coleridge uses as the perfect analogue of Matter hiding behind sensible phenomena" (Jaque Barzun in his book, Darwin, Marx, and Wagner).


Theory of Light and Matter


  • QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard P. Feynman (Paperback - Oct 1, 1988)
  • QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter (Princeton Science Library) by Richard P. Feynman and A. Zee (Paperback - April 4, 2006)
  • Feynman Lectures On Physics (3 Volume Set) by Richard Phillips Feynman (Paperback - Jun 1970)
  • Feynman's Thesis: A New Approach to Quantum Theory by Laurie M. Brown and Richard Phillips Feynman (Hardcover - Aug 30, 2005)
  • Read More »

    Atheists' Club

    Atheists' Club




    Monkey's Uncle
    Fun With Atheism Issue, Fall/Winter 1985
    Editor: E.T. Babinski


    (Scene: A small, smoke filled back room in a little pub in Hackensack, New Jersey, filled with too much talk.)


    "To Order! To Order!" Chairman Angersol shouted above the seething sea of chaos that was...the Atheist's Club.


    "To hell with ORDER!" spake Will Tu Power Zarathinski.


    "Yeah, let's only allow for an instant of synchroneous silence if its number comes up in the Monte Carlo games," seconded Jack Monad.


    "Shut up, I said, GOD dammit!"


    Everyone did, and stared at Angersol with expressions of malevolence and wonder on their faces.


    Angersol continued, "Soooo, there is something to be said for God after all. He's obviously claimed your attention!" (General laughter bumbled around the room, blindly.)


    Then Angersol announced, "As we agreed last week, tonight is 'problem of evil' night..."


    "And my problem, night after night, is that I can't get enough of it" Mark E. Desade yodled.


    "Really, let's get serious, men. We've got a job to do. God is an intolerable brute, and this is his funeral, so let's get to burying him!" Whereupon, Angersol clicked his mug with his neighbors', downed it, and earnestly began "God, you see, cannot be both God and All Powerful, or everything would be all powerfully good. But obviously it's not!"


    It's snot! It's snot!" the club repeated seriously for a full half minute till and eruption of suppressed laughter caused beer to suddenly squirt out of a few members nostrils, like they were the models for some obscene Greek fountains.


    It was then that a peculiar sound summoned the group's sobriety. It was a loud "PSSSSST." First, everyone thought only to stare at the person seated beside themselves. But the origin of the sound remained elusive. "PSSSST." They stared down the hall leading to their meeting room; a few opened windows and peered out. "PSSST. PSSST, PSSST." It was then that everyone motioned toward Angersol's left hand pocket, for that was where the sound was unmistakably emanating from.


    "Uh?" Angersol said, as he slowly reached down into his left hand pocket and withdrew its contents, setting them on the table before the club: a Gideon's New Testament with all the biblical contradictions underlined (by Angersol), a sweaty handerkerchief, and a matchbox. "PSSSSSSSSST," went the matchbook, and everyone stood up in their seats, some standing upon them, to gain a better view. With both hands steadied to keep them from trembling, Angersol opened the matchbox. He looked in and tipped it over. A few matches fell out, nothing more. It was empty. Everyone could see it was empty. Air possessed all the space within that miniscule matchbox. Then the emptiness within that little matchbox... spoke. "You were expecting maybe a pillar of fire? It's me, God. Lord, Creator of the Universe. All Creation, thanking me, breaks bread, drinks wine, and toasts J.C."


    "Oh, good joke, Angersol. Where's the micro-speakers?" asked Ripley B. Leavitt Knott.


    Angersol didn't reply.


    Others pressed him for an explanation.


    Angersol stood firm.


    The matchbox answered, "Look guys, a few of you were blitzed a moment ago. Now you're sober. Go ahead, walk a few straight lines, touch your noses. I sobered you up, so you could ask questions and hear me reply. This is a golden opportunity I'm granting you boys. You may believe anything you want about who or what's talking to you. That's not the point. I don't need your belief, I'm God. I just want a little of your attention."


    At this point Angersol, the matchbox's owner, and presumably the man who knew the most about what the hell was happening, sat calmly down. Everyone could sense hiscerebral caverns filling with blood, swelling to engage the matchbox in intellectual combat. Everyone else politely refrained further comment, allowing the chairman first crack at the attack.


    "My dear little deluded matchbox, or whomever is on the receiving end of this micro-circuit, I have a question to which I unhesitatingly demand an answer. It is the question raised this evening, the gravest question of them all, and the one which shall bury you. What about evil, my friend? Whence comes it? And, Why?"


    "Evil? Whew. I thought you were going to ask me a toughie, like, how I created something out of 'nothing,' about which I'm sure I'd never be able to explain. Not in understandable terms, anyway.


    "Well, 'evil' is sort of like the side of me that likes to take risks. Like Zarathinski's always saying, man's glory is in seeking to overcome himself, to walk the tightrope between himself and the overman. But that's part of my glory too! To seek to outdo, or overdo myself! It was a risk, it was a challenge, but I eventually put so much of myself into my work that I came up with little co-creators. Don't you guys enjoy taking risks? The vigor of mountainclimbing, car racing, fastball pitching, football tackling: conducting experiments. And don't forget all the games you enjoy playing, which purposely involve more risks than real life is apt to contain!


    "If I was to remove all the challenge, risk and responsibility from your lives, you would be driven crazy by irresponsibility. Like if I changed all knives to rubber as soon as an assassin flung one. Or reversed the law of gravity just because an individual was about to take a fall? Or made flying fists sail harmlessly through the body of each person being socked? And while we're on the subject of fantasies, how about if I supplied you with endless food, drink, all gourmet, and magnified your sexual enjoyment one hundred fold? Would you like that too? Or would you become omnibored? Untalking, irresponsible slaves to perpetual pleasure? By the way, I tried such a plan out once with the angels, and not everyone found such a 'Utopia' to their liking. So, guys, why not admit I'm right? Captain Kirk, going someplace boldly, and risking all, even just in movies, is more appealing. I know it, and you know it."


    "Yes, but what about the crucifixion?" Mark E. Desade gloated aloud, "Why not admit that you're into S & M. You love it!"


    "I'm no masochist, Desade. I shared the cosmos' pain that it might be fully born and alive. For the price of responsibility and self knowledge happens to be pain. This is not to say that all pain will automatically bring one to a greater self knowledge, as you imply. It won't. However, the cosmos is still such a part of me that I like with its painful growth as a whole, from Jesus' suffering on the cross to the pain of every sparrow that falls."


    "Yet the sparrow still falls!" Mark Twayne shouted, standing on a chair in the rear of the room.


    "Yes, it does, Mark, and you'll understand more about why, after you've fallen. Till then, this is a purposely risky cosmos."


    Mark, exulting in his precarious perch began to hop up and down upon his seat, "O.K., so this cosmos isn't hell, but we're not living in heaven either."


    "I never said you were, Mark. For all you know a comet could collide with this planet and wipe out life at any time. That would not be the most satisfying way to end our friendly evening together, but you must admit, death is not a dull moment. Likewise, one reason life is thrilling is that it ends in unexpected ways."


    Mark lost his balance and landed on the table before him nose first. He wanted to say "God dammit!" but was so caught up in the unexpected nature of the fall itself that he calmly and quizzically accepted the whole thing, even the pain.


    "But what about pain?" Angersol demanded. "Do we really need it in every case? You seemed to say 'no' to that question a little while ago. Obviously a deformed infant suffers to no purpose. Yet you are the ultimate creator of such suffering! That is, if you are the 'God' to whom I am speaking."


    "I agree with you, Angersol, that was the hardest part of deciding to create this cosmos. But, if I'd created an easy, irresponsible one, would you have given a damn about each other or any 'infant' at all? You'd be mute slaves of irresponsibility with no need to responsibly interract, since I'd be taking care of everything for you.


    "Please keep in mind that I'm not a Pantheist. I do not teach that the world ought to be full of horrors, since so it is. That view is often embraced by tender-hearted people to spare themselves the distress of admitting that anything is horrible after all."


    "Rather, I struggled within myself over whether or not to create this cosmos, and decided that it would be irresponsible of me to
    create a lesser one. Therefore, I risked putting my all into it.


    "All I ask in return is that you fight with me, my little co-creators. For in learning how to overcome is a lesson greater than the pain, and greater than the evil implied in all the risks. If you do not try to see beyond the evil but succumb to it, then you lose your humanity, disgrace yourselves, and I die an evil ogre in your eyes. But whenever you overcome evil and pain, you shine brightly in the eyes of both man and God."


    "Yes, but what real risk did you take? That's something you haven't made completely clear." Angersol inquired.


    "I live in and through you, as long as you never accept the 'necessity' of evil, as long as you continue to ask what the 'problem' of evil is. For I live in the asking, the highest desire for good that is found in your heart."


    A mighty wind blew the matchbox shut, and with the sound of a match being struck, tiny flames began dancing upon the heads of all those present.


    "Remember , I am not far. In me you live, move, and have your being, and... vis versa."


    The next day, Ripley B. Leavitt Knott examined the six-sided paper object in his laboratory with the aid of all the scientific instruments at his disposal. After a few hours he grew discouraged and decided to slice the box up into pieces only several microns thick, and gaze at them beneath an electron microscope. After a few weeks he totalled the exact number of atoms which had previously composed the empty box. But his thorough examination left no final remains of anything for which he'd been searching.



    THE END

    Read More »

    Is God Necessary?



    Monkey's Uncle
    Fun With Atheism Issue, Fall/Winter 1985
    Editor: E.T. Babinski


    Is God Necessary?


    Let us grant, for the sake of argument, that God's existence is unnecessary. That is still not the same as saying that he does not exist. After all, why must the existence of anything be necessary? Why do we have five toes, nine planets, the vastness of space, more brain than man knows what to do with, why is life so fecundant in nature, etc.? I once drew up a story about a group of future scientists who tried reducing man to his bare essentials. These scientists lived, naturally, by eating their own vestigial organs, like their pinkies, the frenulum beneath their tongues, the nictating membranes in the corners of their eyes, their appendixes, the muscles behind their ears, and in fact, eventually ate half of their entire bodies (to have a body with matching halves was merely redundant). Thus, these scientists wound up looking like bowling pins with one arm and one leg hoping about the laboratory. Then they ate portions of each other's tongues so each member of their group could only produce a single letter of the alphabet. Then they hooked their half brains up together and spoke as one being, each member adding his particular sound to their group speech. Lastly, they found a way to live off no each singular atom remaining in their bodies, gathering the maximum energy from each atom, which would enable each of them to exist for approximately 50 quadrillion years. Well, as you can see (with both of your eyes) they reduced their lives to their necessary basis. Everything unnecessary was discarded. All I have to add is that if belief in God is unnecessary, would not most people still prefer living with it, and with the unnecessary vastness and mystery of life, than with bare bones rationality?


    Natural Selection (if that was the only thing responsible for the process) has obviously provided man with a brain whose capacity for thought goes far beyond any such necessity to do so. Primitive men surviving in Australia have brains no less inferior than graduates at MIT, anatomically speaking. Why then does such unnecessary vastness, and/or an immense capacity to expand, exist both in space and time, and in our heads?


    Also, what is the necessity of laughter and play? These things occur when nothing more needs to be done. They reflect life's over-abundant quality. And yet we somehow sense that their foolish energy is the magnet that draws us toward life, and not the bland, analytical need to survive that the Darwinists proclaim. For really, when you think about it, nothing needs to survive, extinction is the rule! But at least we get to strut our stuff on this planet for a while, and perhaps for fun and laughter and life, and not for survival. (Species replace each other in time and space comparatively quickly, and not unlike the guests on a variety program like Johnny Carson's Tonight Show.) Isn't that the real secret of life?


    Perhaps that's why even Koko, a 14-year-old lowland gorilla (who has a vocabulary of over 500 hand-language signs) makes jokes:

    THE FOLLOWING INCIDENTS ARE FROM "CONVERSATIONS WITH A GORILLA" BY FRANCINE PATTERSON, WHICH APPEARED IN NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, OCTOBER, 1978:


    Cathy Ransom, one of my assistants, told me that Koko and her had been arguing... Koko was shown a poster of herself... Manipulating hands and fingers, Cathy asked Koko, 'What's this?' 'Gorilla,' signed Koko. 'Who gorilla?' asked Cathy. 'Bird,' responded a bratty Koko. 'You bird?' asked Cathy. 'You,' countered Koko. 'Not me, you are bird,' rejoined Cathy, mindful that 'bird' can be an insult in Koko's lexicon. 'Me gorilla,' asserted Koko. 'Who bird?' asked Cathy. 'You nut,' replied Koko, resorting to another of her insults. (For Koko, 'bird' and 'nut' switch from descriptive to pejorative by changing the position in which the sign is made.) 'Why me nut?' asked Cathy. 'Nut, nut,' signed Koko. 'You nut. not me,' Cathy replied. Finally, Koko gave up. Plaintively she signed, 'Damn, me good,' and walked away signing, 'Bad.'"


    Koko the Gorilla
    Want to skateboard?, Penny asked Koko with a sign representing two legs on a platform. Koko's tight-lipped grimace indicates slight annoyance after seeing Penny fall several times. Koko does not like to stand on the skateboard, but will scoot around on it.


    "My associate, Barbara Hiller saw Koko signing, 'That red,' as she built a nest out of a white towel. Barbara said, 'You know better, Koko. What color is it?' Koko insisted that it was red--'red, Red, RED'--and finally held up a minute speck of red lint that had been clinging to the towel. Koko was grinning. Another time, after persistent efforts on Barbara's part to get Koko to sign, 'Drink,' Koko just leaned back on the counter and executed a perfect drink sign--in her ear. Again she was grinning."


    "I asked Koko, 'Tell me something you think is funny.' She signed, 'Nose there,' pointing to a bird puppet's tongue. 'That red,' showing me a green plastic frog. When I put a stethoscope to my ears, Koko smirked and put fingers over her eyes."


    "I asked Koko, 'Are you an animal or a person?' Koko's instant response, 'Fine animal gorilla.'"


    Cro Magnon Man
    Cro-Magnon man's self portraits show his sense of humor.

    Read More »

    Fun With Atheism - Atheism Test




    Monkey's Uncle
    Fun With Atheism Issue, Fall/Winter 1985
    Editor: E.T. Babinski




    ARE YOU AN ATHEIST?(TAKE THIS SIMPLE TEST TO FIND OUT!)
    Question #1Do You Have Free Will?
    (A) Yes
    (B) No
    Question #2What Do You Say After Receiving An Unexpected Sock In The Face?
    (A) "God Damn!"
    (B) "Blind Chance!"
    Question #3Is It Possible To Stand On A Platform Outside The Universe And Snipe At It?
    (A) Yes.
    (B) No.

    The Following Questions Are Either True Or False Circle The Correct Answer):

    Man Is A Machine The Manufactures Manure...
    True? Or False?
    The Average Human Being Is Close To 70% Water (H20)
    True? Or False?

    Human Beings Were Invented By Water As A Device For Transporting Itself From One Place To Another...
    True? Or False?

    ESSAY QUESTION (Worth Nearly The Whole Enchilada):
    A) Pretend That You Are God
    B) Pretend That You Are Nothing.
    Examine The Universe And Alternate Furiously Between Pretensions.

    After completing this test, rish it to Monkey's Uncle where your score will be calculated by a million monkeys entering a million digits every millisecond on a million pocket calculators for a million years, at the end of which time...
    All of the monkeys will have expired, along with the warranties on the pocket calculators. So don't expect a prompt, certified, special delivery letter in the mail, letting you know if you're an atheist or not. I guess we each have to decide that for ourselves.

    Read More »